PATTERSON ET AL.

v.

CITY OF DALLAS

Citator

Cited By

• Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …Regulations are declared to be severable. Section 23. Effective Date These Regulations shall become effective on the fifteenth day of October, 1979. . See, e. g., Patterson v. City of Dallas, 355 S.W. 2d 838 (Tex.Civ.App.1962), appeal dismissed, 372 U.S. 251, 83 S.Ct. 873, 9 L.Ed.2d 732 (1963) (Dallas); City of Houston v. Shober, 362 S.W. 2d 886 (Tex.Civ.App. 1962) (Houston); Holt v. City of San Antonio, 547 S.W. 2d 715 (Tex.Civ.App.1977) (San Antonio). . According to § 12.22 of Vernon’s Texas Code Ann…
• Hogge v. Johnson, 526 F.2d 833 (4th Cir. 1975)
  …substantial federal question presented a similar issue. See Smith v. Keator, 419 U.S. 1043, 95 S.Ct. 613, 42 L.Ed.2d 636 (1974); Rubenstein v. Township of Cherry Hill, 417 U.S. 963, 94 S.Ct. 3165, 41 L.Ed.2d 1136 (1974); Patterson v. City of Dallas, 372 U.S. 251, 83 S.Ct. 873, 9 L.Ed.2d 732 (1963).…
• Colorado Springs Amusements v. Mayor Frank L. Rizzo of the City of Philadelphia, 524 F.2d 571 (3d Cir. 1975)
  …tial federal question 212 Va. 693, 187 S.E. 2d 168 (1972). . The appeals in Smith, Rubenstein, and Kisley were all brought under § 1257(2), see note 6 supra, as was the appeal in Miller, discussed in the Hicks opinion. Patterson v. City of Dallas, 372 U.S. 251, 83 S.Ct. 873, 9 L.Ed.2d 732 (1963), dismissing for want of a substantial federal question 355 S.W. 2d 838 (Tex.Civ.App.1962), cited in the city officials’ brief, is not apposite. Although it involved a challenge to the application of an ordinance n…