FIELDS ET AL.
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1963-03-18
No. 399
Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Edwards v. South Carolina, supra.
372 U.S. 522 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 9 L. Ed. 2d 965 · 83 S. Ct. 887 · SCDB 1962-069 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1950
Cited by 18 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Carolina is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229.

Mr. Justice Clark dissents for the reasons expressed in his dissenting opinion in Edwards v. South Carolina, supra.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Carey v. Gen. Elec. Co., 315 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1963)
    …nt’l Ass’n of Machinists, 304 F. 2d 365 (1st Cir.), cert. granted, 371 U.S. 908, 83 S.Ct. 255, 9 L.Ed.2d 169 (1962), judgment vacated per stipulation and case remanded to District Court with directions to dismiss as moot, 372 U.S. 523, 83 S.Ct. 886, 9 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963), that Court noted that “resolution of an ambiguity in its certification is a matter exclusively for the Board in spite of the fact that preemption, as such, does not apply to actions under section 301 * * ; of situations such as that before u…
  • Anderson v. City OF Albany, 321 F.2d 649 (5th Cir. 1963)
    …n which must necessarily be dependent upon the facts of the particular ease. The United States Supreme Court has dealt with such a situation in Edwards v. South [*658] Carolina, 372 U.S. 229, 83 S.Ct. 680, 9 L.Ed.2d 697 and Fields v. South Carolina, 372 U.S. 522, 83 S.Ct. 887, 9 L.Ed.2d 965. In view of the fact that the trial court has not made any findings of fact dealing with the particular incidents of arrest, and thus, of course, has made no application of the legal principles to the facts, we think it…
  • Parisie v. J.W. Greer, 705 F.2d 882 (7th Cir. 1983)
    …ed States, 408 U.S. 606, 92 S.Ct. 2614, 33 L.Ed.2d 583 (1972); Local No. 1505, IBEW v. Local Lodge No. 1836, International Association of Machinists, 304 F. 2d 365, 368 (1st Cir.1962), vacated on other grounds per curiam, 372 U.S. 523, 83 S.Ct. 886, 9 L.Ed.2d 965 (1963); Anderson v. Knox, 300 F. 2d 296, 297-98 (9th Cir.1962). Finally, only the jurisdictional issue was presented by the appellee. Both the Feder [*895] al Rules of Appellate Procedure and our circuit rules require that petitions for rehearing s…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw