HATTEN
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
HATTEN
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
372 U.S. 766
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 157 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…e light of Gideon, and from the records in subsequent per curiam decisions of that Court, it appears that the Gideon decision must be retro-actively applied. La Forge v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 774, 83 S.Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137 and Rice v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 766, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 137; Hatten v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 766, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 138, and Haynes v. Florida, 372 U.S. 770, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 138; Tull v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 778, 83 S.Ct. 1105, 10 L.Ed.2d 139; Douglas v. Wainwr…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1963)