GILES ET AL.

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By

• Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (U.S. 1963)
  …cqnstitutional provision making the jury in criminal cases “the Judges of Law” does not mean precisely what it seems to say.3 The present status of that provision was reviewed recently in Giles v. State, 229 Md. 370, 183 A. 2d 359, appeal dismissed, 372 U. S. 767, where the several exceptions, added by statute or carved out by judicial construction, are reviewed. One of those exceptions, material here, is that “Trial courts have always passed and still pass upon the admissibility of evidence the jury may con…
• Giles v. Maryland, 386 U.S. 66 (U.S. 1967)
  …We would therefore vacate' the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand to that court for further proceedings. Petitioners had previously appealed unsuccessfully from the convictions, Giles v. State, 229 Md. 370, 183 A. 2d 359, appeal dismissed, 372 U. S. 767, and from the denial of a new trial, Giles v. State, 231 Md. 387, 190 A. 2d 627. Johnson was tried and convieted of rape of the girl at a separate trial in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. His application for post-conviction relief is bei…
• Rodger Wyley v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 372 F.2d 742 (4th Cir. 1967)
  …equal protection of the laws in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.1 While acknowledging “the force of many of the arguments made by counsel for the petitioner,” the District Court dismissed the petition on the basis of [*744] Giles v. Maryland, 372 U.S. 767, 83 S.Ct. 1102, 10 L.Ed.2d 137 (1963). In that case, the constitutionality of section 5 had been brought into question,- but the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal “for want of a substantial federal question.” Appellant objects that charging that “…

  ← 1 / 2 →