TILLER
v.
CALIFORNIA ET AL.

U.S. | 1963-04-22
No. 797
Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.
372 U.S. 771 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 10 L. Ed. 2d 140 · 83 S. Ct. 1107 · SCDB 1962-088 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 1738
Cited by 19 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Clark and Mr. Justice Harlan dissent for the reasons stated in their opinions in Douglas v. California, 372 U. S., at 358, 360.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • King v. State, 157 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)
    …t. 1106, 10 L.Ed.2d 139 and Hartsfield v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 782, 83 S.Ct. 1106. 10 L.Ed.2d 139; Watt v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 769, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Bd .2d 140 and Arnold v. Director, Florida Division of Corrections, 372 U.S. 769, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Ed.2d 140; Peterson v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 108, 83 S.Ct. 1689, 10 L.Ed.2d 1028; Laughner v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 489, 83 S.Ct. 1879, 10 L.Ed.2d 1045; Herb v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 505, 83 S.Ct. 1880, 10 L.Ed.2d 1046; Holmes v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 506, 83 S.C…
    1 / 2
  • Arnold v. Cochran, 154 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 1963)
    …PER CURIAM. This matter recurs for consideration upon the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States, Arnold v. Director, Florida Division of Corrections, 372 U.S. 769, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Ed.2d 140. Pursuant to the directions of that court it is now found that the petition, if proved, alleges grounds for post-conviction relief. In order to expedite the disposition of the matter, we decline to issue a writ of habeas corpus, but…
  • Swenson v. Donnell, 382 F.2d 248 (8th Cir. 1967)
    …374 U.S. 509, 83 S.Ct. 1883, 10 L.Ed.2d 1047 (1963) ; Jones v. State of California, 374 U.S. 501, 83 S.Ct. 1S78, 10 L.Ed.2d 1045 (1963) ; Harris v. California, 374 U.S. 499, 83 S.Ct. 1870, 10 L.Ed.2d 1044 (1963) ; Tiller v. California, 372 U.S. 771, 83 S.Ct. 1107, 10 L.Ed.2a 140 (1963). . See also Tettamble v. Missouri, 386 U.S. 265, 87 S.Ct. 1034, 18 L.Ed.2d 42 (March 13, 1967), reversing per curiam, State v. Tettamble, 394 S.W. 2d 375 (Mo.1965), a post-Douglas decision. . Recent opinions of the Supreme C…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw