LAFORGE
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
LAFORGE
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
372 U.S. 774
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 157 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…ted States Supreme Court and were remanded for reconsideration in the light of Gideon, and from the records in subsequent per curiam decisions of that Court, it appears that the Gideon decision must be retro-actively applied. La Forge v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 774, 83 S.Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137 and Rice v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 766, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 137; Hatten v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 766, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 138, and Haynes v. Florida, 372 U.S. 770, 83 S.Ct. 1104, 10 L.Ed.2d 138; Tull v. Wainwr…
-
LaFORGE v. Cochran, 154 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1963)…PER CURIAM. This matter recurs for consideration upon the judgment and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States. LaForge v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 774, 83 S. Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137. Pursuant to the directions of that Court it is now found that the petition, if proved, alleges grounds for post-conviction relief. In order to expedite the disposition of the matter we de- [*691] dine to issue a writ…
Authorities Cited
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1963)