PATTERSON

v.

WARDEN, MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Raymond Durocher v. LaVALLEE, 330 F.2d 303 (2d Cir. 1964)
  …is sentencing? Or perhaps the alleged date of the crime is critical. Against such casuistry we hasten to add our simple point: Constitutional rights should not depend on arcane logic or trivial events. . As in Patterson v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 372 U.S. 776, 83 S.Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137, decided April 22, 1963. . That result is also assumed in the following precedents: Lopez v. United States, 373 U.S. 427, 445, 83 S.Ct. 1381, 10 L.Ed.2d 462, where in a ease involving a preGideon trial, Warren, Ch. J„…
• McDONALD v. Moore, 353 F.2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …f the case were factors to be considered. Patterson v. State, 227 Md. 194, 175 A. 2d 746. The case reached the Supreme Court during the same term as Gideon and the cause was remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon. Patterson v. Warden, 372 U.S. 776, 83 S.Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137. The Court of Appeals of Maryland remanded to the trial court. Patterson v. State, 231 Md. 509, 191 A. 2d 237. In Arizona the court rule provided that the trial court should assign counsel to represent indigents accus…
• Wilson v. Blabon, 370 F.2d 997 (9th Cir. 1967)
  …itutional question, that both reason and policy require that it does. [See: DeJoseph v. Connecticut, 385 U.S. -, 87 S.Ct. 526, 17 L.Ed.2d 443 (December 5, 1966); Patterson v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 227 Md. 194, 175 A. 2d 746 (1961), remanded 372 U.S. 776, 83 S.Ct. 1103, 10 L.Ed.2d 137, rev’d 231 Md. 509, 191 A. 2d 237 (1963); McDonald v. Moore, 353 F. 2d 106 (5th Cir. 1965); Harvey v. State of Mississippi, 340 F. 2d 263 (5th Cir. 1965); Evans v. Rives, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 242, 126 F. 2d 633 (1942); Comm…

Authorities Cited

• Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1963)