BELVIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Harris, 458 F.2d 670 (5th Cir. 1972)
  …fate of the second co-defendant. See Flores v. United States, supra; Schaeffer v. United States, 5 Cir. 1955, 221 F. 2d 17; Barton v. United States, 5 Cir. 1959, 263 F. 2d 894; Belvin v. United States, 5 Cir. 1960, 273 F. 2d 583, cert. denied, 1963, 372 U.S. 922, 83 S.Ct. 737, 9 L.Ed.2d 726; Wright, Proposed Changes in Federal Civil, Criminal, and Appellate Procedure, 35 F.R.D. 317 (1964). Rather, one of the alleged conspirators in the burglary, John L. Johnson, turned state’s evidence prior to trial and to…
• Flores v. United States, 379 F.2d 905 (5th Cir. 1967)
  …iplined than those of the average human juror.” See also Schaffer v. United States, 221 F. 2d 17 (5th Cir., 1955) also reversing [*909] for failure to grant a separate trial. In Belvin v. United States, 273 F. 2d 583 (5th Cir., 1960), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 922, 83 S.Ct. 737, 9 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963), no motion for a severance had been made but during trial there was introduced a confession by one codefendant which implicated the others. The other defendants, claiming surprise, moved for a mistrial, which was…
• United States v. Richman, 369 F.2d 465 (7th Cir. 1966)
  …im against double jeopardy. Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 431, 52 S.Ct. 417, 76 L.Ed. 861 (1932). The exact statutory words need not be used. Glenn v. United States, 303 F. 2d 536, 538 (5th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, Belvin v. United States, 372 U.S. 922, 83 S.Ct. 737, 9 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963). We hold that the element of knowledge was sufficiently charged in Counts 1, 7 and 13 by the words “for the purpose of executing” the scheme. The scheme to which this phrase refers was charged in Count 1 and inco…