WALLACE

v.

BOLES, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Hampton, 457 F.2d 299 (7th Cir. 1972)
  …t, he had a right to select his own counsel on the morning of the trial. It is well established law that an indigent does not have the absolute right to a counsel of his own choosing, Reiff v. United States, 299 F. 2d 366 (9 Cir., 1962), cert. den. 372 U.S. 937, 83 S.Ct. 884, 9 L.Ed.2d 768. From the record of the proceedings in this case, the first instant defendant Hampton voiced any words of discontent over his appointed counsel was the morning of the trial. As a former trial judge, the writer of this o…
• Gregory v. United States, 585 F.2d 548 (1st Cir. 1978)
  …uired by Rule 4(b).6 Given the business of the district court and Gregory’s own eight-year delay in filing his motion, we are not so sure that six months was unreasonable. See Reiff v. United States, 299 F. 2d 366, 367 (9th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 937, 83 S.Ct. 884, 9 L.Ed.2d 768 (1963). In any event, there is no indication that Gregory was prejudiced in any way by the alleged lack of promptness. See Conley v. [*551] United States, 407 F. 2d 45, 47 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 853, 90 S.Ct.…
• Holt v. United States, 329 F.2d 368 (7th Cir. 1964)
  …of a five-year sentence if he would change his plea. The Solicitor General stated: “This claim is refuted by the record”. He proceeded to analyze the charges and the reasons for recommending the denial of certiorari, which followed on March 4, 1963. 372 U.S. 937, 83 S.Ct. 884, 9 L.Ed.2d 767. By his petition dated May 21, 1963, Holt prayed for appointment of counsel. On July 1, 1963, the district court entered an order which found that the petition under § 2255 set up no basis for relief, that the question…