INDEMNITY INSURANCE CO. OF NORTH AMERICA, INC., ET AL.

v.

AMERICAN FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO., INC.

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
• Gebhard v. United States, 422 F.2d 281 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …of facts to show what the truth of the matter was and what the defendant must have known, this should be enough to go to the jury. The government’s argument is supported by United States v. Nicoletti, 7 Cir., 1962, 310 F. 2d 359, cert. denied 1963, 372 U.S. 942, 83 S.Ct. 935, 9 L.Ed.2d 968. In that case ,the defendant testified under oath that he did not recall having an interview with the F.B.I. the preceding year. The court was persuaded by the government’s argument that proof of recollection cannot be m…
• United States v. Sweig, 441 F.2d 114 (2d Cir. 1971)
  …to be wholly without merit.7 Affirmed. . See also Gebhard v. United States, 422 F. 2d 281, 287-288 (9th Cir. 1970); La Placa v. United States, supra, 354 F. 2d at 58-59; United States v. Nicoletti, 310 F. 2d 359, 364 (7th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 942, 83 S.Ct. 935, 9 L.Ed.2d 968 (1963); United States v. Beach, 296 F. 2d 153, 155 (4th Cir. 1961); and United States v. Magin, supra, 280 F. 2d at 77-78. . Rule 8 provides: Joinder of Offenses and of Defendants (a) Joinder of Offenses. Two or more…