ALLEGRUCCI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (50 total)

• State v. Hill, 504 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
  …quirement of laying the proper foundation and held that in the interest of justice the impeaching evidence should have been admitted for what it was worth. Accord People v. Rosoto, 58 Cal.2d 304, 373 P. 2d 867, 23 Cal.Rptr. 779 (1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 954, 83 S.Ct. 950, 9 L.Ed.2d 978 (1963). Attacking the credibility of prior testimony which is being introduced at a later hearing by evidence of subsequent contradictory statements seems to have been contemplated by section 90.806(1), Florida Statutes…
• United States v. Healy, 376 U.S. 75 (U.S. 1964)
  …lthough not within 30 days of the original entry of judgment. Since the petition for rehearing was filed within 30 days of the judgment, we are not faced with an attempt to rejuvenate an extinguished right to appeal. Cf. Allegrucci v. United States, 372 U. S. 954. The question, therefore, is simply whether in a criminal case a timely petition for rehearing by the Government filed within the permissible time for appeal [*78] renders the judgment not final for purposes of appeal until the court disposes of the…
• United States v. Bozza, 365 F.2d 206 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …nied, 337 U.S. 931, 69 S.Ct. 1484, 93 L.Ed.2d 1738. (.1948) ; Berry v. United States, 271 F. 2d 775 (5 Cir. 1959), cert, denied, 362 U.S. 903, 80 S.Ct. 612, 4 L.Ed.2d 555 (1960); Baker v. United States, 310 F. 2d 924, 929-930 (9 Cir.), cert, denied, 372 U.S. 954.11 Under these circumstances the court’s general charge that testimony of an accomplice “should be received with great caution and weighed with great care” and that the jury should not convict “upon the unsupported evidence of an accomplice unless y…