O'DAY CORPORATION

v.

TALMAN CORPORATION ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Truck Equip. Serv. Co. v. Fruehauf Corp., 536 F.2d 1210 (8th Cir. 1976)
  …can Rolex Watch Corp. v. Ricoh Time Corp., 491 F. 2d 877 (2nd Cir. 1974) (per curiam); Bose Corporation v. Linear Design Labs, Inc., 467 F. 2d 304 (2nd Cir. 1972); O’Day Corporation v. Talman Corporation, 310 F. 2d 623 (1st Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 977, 83 S.Ct. 1112, 10 L.Ed.2d 142 (1963); West Point Manufacturing Co. v. Detroit Stamping Co., 222 F. 2d 581 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 350 U.S. 840, 76 S.Ct. 80, 100 L.Ed. 749 (1955), and J. C. Penney Co. v. H. D. Lee Mercantile Co., 120 F. 2d 949 (8t…
• Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. The NEW Body Boutique, Inc., 652 F.2d 299 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …picted in their ads. See Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Emenee Industries, Inc., 16 A.D.2d 420, 228 N.Y.S.2d 514 (1st Dep’t 1962); George O’Day Associates, Inc. v. Talman Corp., 206 F.Supp. 297 (D.R.I.), aff’d, 310 F. 2d 623 (1st Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 977, 83 S.Ct. 1112, 10 L.Ed.2d 142 (1963). And, unlike the copier of novelty [*305] lights in Crossbow, defendants are not trading improperly on an existing market impression that its goods are actually those manufactured by plaintiff, because there was…
• Co-Rect Prods., Inc. v. Marvy! Advertising Photography, Inc., 780 F.2d 1324 (8th Cir. 1985)
  …ique, Inc., 652 F. 2d 299, 305 (2d Cir.1981); Pantone, Inc. v. A.I. Friedman, Inc., 294 F.Supp. 545, 552 (S.D.N.Y.1968); George O’Day Associates, Inc. v. Talman Corp., 206 F.Supp. 297, 300 (D.R.I.), aff’d, 310 F. 2d 623 (1st Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 977, 83 S.Ct. 1112, 10 L.Ed.2d 142 (1963). Finally, the appropriate provision for determining the monetary relief to be awarded under section 43(a) is section 35 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117 (West Supp.1985). Metric & Multistandard Components, 6…