YOGURT MASTER, INC.,

v.

WIRTZ, SECRETARY OF LABOR

Citator

Cited By (35 total)

• United States v. Haldeman, 559 F.2d 31 (D.C. Cir. 1976)
  …that the “ ‘pattern of deep and bitter prejudice’ shown to be present throughout the community” had invaded the jury box. Id. at 727, 81 S.Ct. at 1645. See also United States ex rel. Bloeth v. Denno, 313 F. 2d 364 (2d Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1112, 10 L.Ed.2d 143 (1963). . Cf. Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541, 556, 82 S.Ct. 955, 8 L.Ed.2d 98 (1962); United States ex rel. Darcy v. Handy, 351 U.S. 454, 457, 76 S.Ct. 965, 100 L.Ed. 1331 (1956); Calley v. Callaway, 519 F. 2d 184,…
• United States v. Kelly, 349 F.2d 720 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …e trial judge had the benefit of seeing and hearing Juror No. 3 in person. See, e. g., Rideau v. State of Louisiana, 1963, 373 U.S. 723, 83 S.Ct. 1417, 10 L.Ed.2d 663; United States ex rel. Bloeth v. Denno, 2 Cir., 1963, 313 F. 2d 364, cert. denied, 372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1112, 10 L.Ed.2d 143. But the governing rule with respect to questions concerning jur- or prejudice is: “The finding of the trial court upon that issue ought not to be set aside by a reviewing court, unless the error is manifest.” Reynolds…
• Washington v. Strickland, 693 F.2d 1243 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …d, 434 U.S. 851, 98 S.Ct. 164, 54 L.Ed.2d 120 (1977). . See, e.g., Young v. Zant, 677 F. 2d 792, 798-800 (11th Cir. 1982); Kemp v. Leggett, 635 F. 2d 453, 454-55 (5th Cir.1981); Brubaker v. Dickson, 310 F. 2d 30, 38-39 (9th Cir.1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 978, 83 S.Ct. 1110, 10 L.Ed.2d 143 (1963). . The determination whether strategic choices based upon a set of assumptions are reasonable is a question of fact for the district courts. We suggest only a few factors to inform that determination. First, t…