SHARROW

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Grunewald v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co., 331 F.2d 983 (8th Cir. 1964)
  …2d 990, 996 (8 Cir. 1964) ; McDonnell v. Tabah, 297 F. 2d 731, 733 (2 Cir. 1961) ; Girard Trust Co. v. Amsterdam, 128 F. 2d 376, 377 (5 Cir. 1942); Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Kent, 309 F. 2d 891 (6 Cir. 1962), petition for certiorari dismissed 372 U.S. 982, 83 S.Ct. 1118, 10 L.Ed.2d 197. See Rhodes v. Houston, 202 F.Supp. 624, 631 (D.Neb.1962), aff’d 309 F. 2d 959 (8 Cir.), cert. denied 372 U.S. 909, 83 S.Ct. 724, 9 L.Ed.2d 719. It is of interest to note that the Missouri courts enunciate the same pr…
• Cerda v. United States, 391 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1968)
  …roperly granted a continuance, no abuse of that court’s broad discretion has here been demonstrated. Velarde-Villareal v. United States, 354 F. 2d 9 (9th Cir. 1965); Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Kent, 309 F. 2d 891 (6th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 982, 83 S.Ct. 1118, 10 L.Ed.2d 197 (1963). As to appellant’s second point, there was no proof of entrapment as a matter of law. The jury was properly instructed on the law of entrapment (Tr. 269-71), but, as the trier of fact, did not “buy” such a defe…