JONES, CHAIRMAN OF NAVAJO TRIBAL COUNCIL OF NAVAJO INDIAN TRIBE,

v.

HEALING, CHAIRMAN OF HOPI COUNCIL OF HOPI INDIAN TRIBE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Hamilton v. Nakai, 453 F.2d 152 (9th Cir. 1971)
  …Tribes each had an undivided and equal interest in all the reservation lying outside the boundaries of the land management district. Healing v. Jones, D.Ariz., 1962, 210 F.Supp. 125. The Supreme Court affirmed this judgment. Jones v. Healing, 1963, 373 U.S. 758, 83 S.Ct. 1559, 10 L.Ed.2d 703. On March 13, 1970, the Hopi Indian Tribe petitioned the District Court for an order of compliance or writ of assistance to enforce its rights as a co-tenant. More specifically, in paragraphs 3 and 4 of their prayer f…
• Wichita and Affiliated Tribes of Oklahoma v. Hodel, 788 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1986)
  …321, 341, 6 S.Ct. 1073, 1080, 30 L.Ed. 211 (1886); see also Healing v. Jones, 210 F.Supp. 125 (D.Ariz.1962) (conveyance to Hopi and Navajo tribes resulted in joint, undivided and equal ownership notwithstanding disparity in sizes of tribes), aff'd, 373 U.S. 758, 83 S.Ct. 1559, 10 L.Ed.22d 703 (1963). The fact is, however, that in this case only one entity was actually listed: Wichita and Affiliated Bands of Indians. The order then explained, in a parenthetical, that the Affiliated Bands are today comprised…
• Abbott Sekaquaptewa v. MacDONALD, 544 F.2d 396 (9th Cir. 1976)
  …the Reservation lands presented a justiciable question and hence the Act conferring jurisdiction (Act of July 22, 1958) was a proper exercise of Congressional power. The Three-Judge Court in Healing v. Jones, 210 F.Supp. 125 (D.C.Ariz., 1962), aff’d 373 U.S. 758, 83 S.Ct. 1559, 10 L.Ed.2d 703 (1963), (Healing II), decided on the merits that the Hopi was entitled to exclusive possession of a portion of the Reservation (Land Management District 6) and that as to the remainder, the joint use area, the two trib…