WATKINS PRODUCTS, INC., FORMERLY KNOWN AS J. R. WATKINS CO.,

v.

SUNWAY FRUIT PRODUCTS, INC.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Pope v. United States, 372 F.2d 710 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …esiding in their respective communities than might be expected of the average citizen.” We note, initially, that no question of race is involved in this point. In Beatrice Foods Co. v. United States, 312 F. 2d 29, 33-37 (8 Cir. 1963), cert. denied 373 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 1289, 10 L.Ed.2d 199, we had occasion to pass upon the Nebraska suggester system so far as it related to the selection of a grand jury. There, however, a specific pretrial and even pre-pleading challenge had been made and evidence as to th…
• United States v. Ralph "Whitey" Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069 (2d Cir. 1969)
  …not in the 1957 amendment establish a uniform system of providing for the selection of a list of qualified jurors from which grand or petit jurors were to be drawn. Beatrice Foods Co. v. United States, 312 F. 2d 29, 35 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 1289, 10 L.Ed.2d 199 (1963). The selection process and the choice of specific sources from which names might be drawn were entrusted to the court clerk and jury commissioner. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co., 328 U.S. 217, 220, 66 S.Ct. 984…
• United States v. Skillman, 442 F.2d 542 (8th Cir. 1971)
  …ons and has rejected them. See e. g., Theriault v. United States, 401 F. 2d 79 (8th Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1100, 89 S.Ct. 898, 21 L.Ed.2d 792 (1968); Beatrice Foods Co. v. United States, 312 F. 2d 29 (8th Cir. 1963), cert. [*558] denied, 373 U.S. 904, 83 S.Ct. 1289, 10 L.Ed.2d 199 (1963). We hold there was no error. (2) Defendant next contends that the district court, in effect, coerced a verdict by advising the jury in its main charge that unanimity was required, and explaining the effect of a…