PRESTON

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Preston v. United States, 376 U.S. 364 (U.S. 1964)
  …, rejecting the contentions, timely made in the trial and appellate courts, that [*365] both the original arrest, on a charge of vagrancy, and the subsequent search and seizure had violated the Fourth Amendment. 305 F. 2d 172. We granted certiorari. 373 U. S. 931. In the view we take of the case, we heed not decide whether the arrest was valid, since we hold that the search and seizure was not-. The police of Newport, Kentucky, received a telephone complaint at 3 o’clock one morning that “three suspicious m…
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Exch. Parts Co., 375 U.S. 405 (U.S. 1964)
  …ection. The precise issue is whether that section prohibits the conferral of such benefits, without more, where the employer’s purpose is to affect the outcome of the election. We granted the National Labor Relations Board’s petition for certiorari, 373 U. S. 931, to clear up a possible conflict between the decision below and those of other Courts of Appeals1 on an important question of national labor policy. For reasons given in this opinion, we conclude that the judgment below must be reversed. The respon…
• George Banta Co., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 686 F.2d 10 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
  …ive of right to strike for employer to grant employees who abandon a strike preference with respect to protection from layoff, preferred shifts, and other employment rights); Swarco, Inc. v. NLRB, 303 F. 2d 668, 670-73 (6th Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 931, 83 S.Ct. 1533, 10 L.Ed.2d 689 (1963) (destructive of right to strike for employer to promise prestrike employees who abandon a strike immunity from “bumping” by later returning strikers with greater seniority). Banta posits the legality of its PRS…