KEELER ET UX.
v.
UNITED STATES
KEELER ET UX.
UNITED STATES
373 U.S. 932
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Caution
Cited by 51 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (50 total)
-
Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879 (U.S. 1988)…cial retirement benefits); Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 30-31, 310 F. 2d 381, 396-397 (1962) (claim under 10 U. S. C. §1201 et seq., entitling servicemen to disability -retirement benefits), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U. S. 932 (1963); Smykowski v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 284, 285, 647 F. 2d 1103, 1104 (1981) (claim under [*920] 42 U. S. C. §§3796-3796c, granting survivors’death benefits for public safety officers). Another large category of the Claims Court’s former…1 / 2
-
MacKlin v. Spector Freight Sys., Inc., 478 F.2d 979 (D.C. Cir. 1973)…consideration. See Williams v. United States, 434 F. 2d 1346, 193 Ct.Cl. 440 (1970) ; Steel Improvement & Forge Co. v. United States, 355 F. 2d 627, 174 Ct.Cl. 24 (1966) ; Friedman v. United States, 310 F. 2d 381, 159 Ct.Cl. 1 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 932, 83 S.Ct. 1540, 10 L.Ed.2d 691 (1963). But this rule, based on a series of statutes with fixed limitations and fixed procedures for presentation of claims, should not, in our view, be applied mechanically to the situation before us. For one thing,…
-
Sanders v. The United States, 594 F.2d 804 (Ct. Cl. 1979)…Cl. 239, 256-59 (1958), the court supported this position in a careful review of the legislative history of the correction board statute. Cf. Friedman v. United States, 310 F. 2d 381, 159 Ct.Cl. 1 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932, 83 S.Ct. 1540, 10 L.Ed.2d 691 (1963). Even if it be argued that the statute and the legislative history are not all that clear and compelling, certainly it is a view reinforced by the Administrative Procedure Act, which embodies the basic presump…
Previewing 3 of 50 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence