PETZELT

v.

MAYER

Citator

Cited By

• Retail Clerks Int'l Ass'n v. Lion DRY Goods, Inc., 341 F.2d 715 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …38, 241, 82 S.Ct. 1318, 8 L.Ed.2d 462; John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston, etc., [*720] 376 U.S. 543, 546-547, 84 S.Ct. 9t)9, 11 L.Ed.2d 898; Jefferson City Cabinet Co. v. International Union, etc., 313 F. 2d 231, 232-233, C.A. 6th, cert. denied, 373 U.S. 936, 83 S.Ct. 1539, 10 L.Ed.2d 690. If the Court finds as a matter of law that there is no valid contract between the parties providing for arbitration of disputes between the parties or, although such a contract may exist, it does not by its terms pro…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• Anti-Monopoly, Inc. v. Gen. Mills FUN Grp., 611 F.2d 296 (9th Cir. 1979)
  …inly erred in concluding that questions relating to the validity of the MONOPOLY trademark raised legal issues, although both parties sought only equitable relief. See Shubin v. United States Dist. Court, 313 F. 2d 250, 251 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 936, 83 S.Ct. 1539, 10 L.Ed.2d 690 (1963) ; Robine v. Apeo, Inc., 227 F.Supp. 512, 516-17 (S.D.N.Y.1964), aff’d, 386 F. 2d 267 (2d Cir. 1967). That being so, the order, vacating the earlier grant of a jury trial to Anti-Monopoly, was properly entered.…
• Chambers v. Beaunit Corp., 404 F.2d 128 (6th Cir. 1968)
  …uding arbitration, provided for in the collective bargaining agreement. Republic Steel Corp. v. Maddox, 379 U.S. 650, 85 S.Ct. 614, 13 L.Ed.2d 580; Local 748 of Int. U. of E. R. & M. Wkrs. v. Jefferson City Cab Co., 314 F. 2d 192 (C.A.6), cert. den. 373 U.S. 936, 83 S.Ct. 1539,10 L.Ed.2d 690; Broniman v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 353 F. 2d 559 (C.A.6), cert. den. 384 U.S. 907, 86 S.Ct. 1343, 16 L.Ed.2d 360. Where arbitration is provided for by contract the Court’s function is limited solely to deter…