W. J. DILLNER TRANSFER CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Udall v. Washington, 398 F.2d 765 (D.C. Cir. 1968)
  …nal basis” for the action taken. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United States, 292 U.S. 282, 286-287, 54 S.Ct. 692, 78 L.Ed. 1260 (1934). See also Thor-Westcliffe Development, Inc. v. Udall, 114 U.S.App.D.C. 252, 314 F. 2d 257, cert. denied, 373 U.S. 951, 83 S.Ct. 1681, 10 L.Ed.2d 706 (1963). [*770] Such a basis clearly exists in this case. The Secretary reasonably concluded that, for historical and aesthetic reasons, unlimited commuter bus traffic should be permitted south of Memorial Bridge but no…
• Hockenberry v. United States, 422 F.2d 171 (9th Cir. 1970)
  …lvey v. United States, 1922, 260 U.S. 353, 357, 43 S.Ct. 132, 134, 67 L.Ed. 301. See also United States v. Rowlette, 7 Cir., 1968, 397 F. 2d 475, 479; United States v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co., 3 Cir., 1963, 315 F. 2d 107, 109, cert. denied, 1963, 373 U.S. 951, 83 S.Ct. 1681, 10 L.Ed.2d 706; United States v. Hansen, 9 Cir., 1958, 264 F. 2d 540, 543. The indictment does not conform exactly to the language of the applicable [*174] statute, but we are admonished by Rule 7(c), F.R.Crim.P. that “[e]rror in th…
• Gayer v. Schlesinger, 490 F.2d 740 (D.C. Cir. 1973)
  …tion which he can supply, although he is under no legal obligation to do so. The situation is analogous in its legal aspects, though not in its factual context, to Blumenthal v. F. C. C., 115 U.S.App. D.C. 305, 308, 318 F. 2d 276, 279, cert, denied, 373 U.S. 951, 83 S.Ct. 1679, 10 L.Ed.2d 706 (1963), in which we said: The Fifth Amendment privilege protects a person who invokes it from self-accusation; but when he seeks a license at the hands of an agency acting under the standard of the public interest, an…