HENRY ET AL.
v.
VIRGINIA

U.S. | 1963-06-10
No. 29
Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U. S., at 248.
374 U.S. 98 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, the judgments are vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of Virginia for reconsideration in light of Peterson v. City of Greenville, 373 U. S. 244.

Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the result on the premises stated in his separate opinion in Peterson v. City of Greenville and Avent v. North Carolina, 373 U. S., at 248.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Bell v. Maryland, 378 U.S. 226 (U.S. 1964)
    …Ownership: Privately owned corporation. 5. Hooper Food Company, Inc. Case: Bell v. Maryland, supra, p. 226. Location: Several restaurants in Baltimore, Maryland. Ownership: Privately owned corporation. 6. Howard Johnson Co. Case: Henry v. Virginia, 374 U. S. 98. Location: 650 restaurants in 25 States. Ownership: Publicly owned corporation. Number of shareholders: 15,203. Stock traded: New York Stock Exchange. 7. Jones Drug Company, Inc. Case: Williams v. North Carolina, post, p. 548. Location: Monroe, Nort…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw