KOVNER
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
KOVNER
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
374 U.S. 492
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
King v. State, 157 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963)…80, 10 L.Ed.2d 1046; Holmes v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 506, 83 S.Ct. 1881, 10 L.Ed.2d 1046; Palmer v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 507, 83 S.Ct. 1881, 10 L.Ed.2d 1046 and Baxley v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 508, 83 S.Ct. 1882, 10 L.Ed.2d 1046; Bryant v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 492, 83 S.Ct. 1884, 10 L.Ed.2d 1047 and Auflick v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 494, 83 S.Ct. 1887, 10 L.Ed.2d 1047; Kovner v. Wainwright, 374 U.S. 492, 83 S.Ct. 1891, 10 L.Ed.2d 1048; and Buffington v. Wainwright, 373 U.S. 543, 83 S.Ct. 1540, 10 L.Ed.2d 688. A…1 / 2
-
Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U.S. 2 (U.S. 1963)…ment.3 The Court’s opinion in Gideon contains no discussion of this issue. Similarly, in cases decided last Term in which we summarily vacated [*4] the judgment and remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon, e. g., Bryant v. Wainwright, 374 U. S. 492, the question of retroactivity was not treated in the dispositions. Such cases as Eskridge v. Washington State Prison Board, 357 U. S. 214, and Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U. S. 420, hardly constitute precedents for a rule of general application. In…
Authorities Cited
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1963)