HENRY REICHERT AND SOFFI REICHERT
v.
GLADYS NELSON
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court affirmed a foreclosure decree on a real estate mortgage and a conditional sales contract, upholding the lower court's decision based on a stipulation between the parties regarding the debt amount and security.
The court found no reversible error in the foreclosure decree.
“It Is Hereby Stipulated By and Between counsel for the Complainant and Defendants that the retain title note and contract marked Complainant’s Exhibit £B’ and mortgage deed marked Complainant’s Exhibit £C’ and attached to and made a part of the Bill of Complaint in this cause, were given to secure a like sum in the amount of Thirteen Hundred Dollars, and that the total amount due the Complainant by the Defendants at the time of the execution of the foregoing exhibits was in .the sum of Thirteen Hundred Dollars; the point of fact admitted being-that both instruments secured the singular debt of Thirteen Hundred Dollars.”
This quote represents the stipulation between the parties that formed the basis of the lower court's decision regarding the debt amount.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Reicherts appealed a foreclosure decree on a real estate mortgage and a conditional sales contract for personal property, which was filed after th…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
— The appeal is from final decree of foreclosure of a real estate mortgage and a conditional sales contract embracing personal property to enforce the payment of $1300.00 with interest costs and attorneys’ fees.
Suit was filed after default in payment of the first installment due. During the taking of the testimony the following stipulation was dictated into the record:
“It Is Hereby Stipulated By and Between counsel for the Complainant and Defendants that the retain title note and contract marked Complainant’s Exhibit £B’ and mortgage deed marked Complainant’s Exhibit £C’ and attached to and made a part of the Bill of Complaint in this cause, were given to secure a like sum in the amount of Thirteen Hundred Dollars, and that the total amount due the Complainant by the Defendants at the time of the execution of the foregoing exhibits was in .the sum of Thirteen Hundred Dollars; the point of fact admitted being-that both instruments secured the singular debt of Thirteen Hundred Dollars.”
*348The final decree is based on this stipulation as to the amount of the indebtedness and the application of the security.
The decree required the real estate to be sold first and the personal property to be sold only in case of necessity to make up the total amount of the decree.
We find no reversible error disclosed in the record and, therefore, the decree appealed from should be and is affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Ellis, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.
Brown and Davis, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.