CRAWLEY
v.
MYERS, CORRECTIONAL SUPERINTENDENT

U.S. | 1963-06-10
Nos. 1203, Misc.
374 U.S. 814 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Losieau v. Sigler, 406 F.2d 795 (8th Cir. 1969)
    …iction: Losieau v. State, 157 Neb. 115, 58 N.W. 2d 824 (1953). Direct appeal. The Supreme Court of Nebraska affirmed the conviction. 1962 Conviction: State v. Losieau, 174 Neb. 320, 117 N.W. 2d 775 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Losieau v. Nebraska, 374 U.S. 814, 83 S.Ct. 1707, 10 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1963). Direct appeal. The Supreme Court of Nebraska affirmed the conviction. State v. Losieau, 179 Neb. 54, 136 N.W. 2d 168 (1905). Direct appeal. The Supreme Court of Nebraska denied the petitioner’s motion for new…
  • United States v. Lashmett, 965 F.2d 179 (7th Cir. 1992)
    …ent statement. See, e.g., Williams v. United States, 403 F. 2d 176, 179 (D.C.Cir.1968) (error to exclude written prior inconsistent statement even though witness admits making it); United States v. Browne, 313 F. 2d 197, 199 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 814, 83 S.Ct. 1707, 10 L.Ed.2d 1037 (1963) (same); see also 3 David W. Louisell & Christopher B. Mueller, Federal Evidence § 358, at 564 (1977) (arguing Rule 613 should be read broadly to permit extrinsic proof of a prior inconsistent statement even if…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw