CLAYTON
v.
NEW YORK

U.S. | 1963-06-10
Nos. 1234, Misc.
374 U.S. 815 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Bonnette, 781 F.2d 357 (4th Cir. 1986)
    …9, 254 (E.D.N.C.1969), appeal dismissed, 429 F. 2d 622 (4th Cir.1970); Eby v. United States, 286 F.Supp. 387 (N.D.Okla.1968), aff'd, 415 F. 2d 319 (10th Cir.1969); cf. Commonwealth ex rel. Almeida v. Rundle, 409 Pa. 460, 187 A. 2d 266, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 815, 83 S.Ct. 1709, 10 L.Ed.2d 1038 (1963) (Pennsylvania Supreme Court denied state habeas relief sought on the basis of a new theory of felony murder that could have removed petitioner's crime from that category, adopted after his conviction had become…
  • United States ex rel. David Almeida v. Rundle, 383 F.2d 421 (3d Cir. 1967)
    …led a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in the Philadelphia Common Pleas Court. It was denied without a hearing, and the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania affirmed. Commonwealth ex rel. Almeida v. Rundle, 409 Pa. 460, 187 A. 2d 266 (1963), cert. den. 374 U.S. 815, 83 S.Ct. 1709, 10 L.Ed. 2d 1038. In 1964, the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus was filed in the court be [*424] low and present counsel were appointed to represent Almeida at the hearing later conducted by Judge Higginbotham. In his thor…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw