MOSS ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1963-06-14
Nos. 1265, Misc.
374 U.S. 819 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ross v. Moffitt, 417 U.S. 600 (U.S. 1974)
    …ns for appointment of counsel by persons seeking to file jurisdictional statements or petitions for certiorari in this Court. See, e. g., Drumm v. California, 373 U. S. 947 (1963); Mooney v. New York, 373 U. S. 947 (1963); Oppenheimer v. California, 374 U. S. 819 (1963). In the light of these authorities, it would be odd, indeed, to read the Fourteenth Amendment to [*618] impose such a requirement on the States, and we decline to do so. VI We do not mean by this opinion to in any way discourage those State…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw