QUINTERO

v.

SINCLAIR REFINING CO.

Citator

Cited By (78 total)

• Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 386 U.S. 714 (U.S. 1967)
  …e available compefisatory remedies.1 The scope of petitioners’2 trademark and the fact of respondents’3 infringement were determined by the Court of- Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at an earlier stage of this litigation. 314 F. 2d 149, cert. denied, 374 U. S. 830 (1963). The case was then remanded to the District Court for the Southern District of California which, after noting that the Court. of Appeals had characterized respondents’ infringing activities as deliberate, entered its own finding to that eff…
• Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local NO. 358, 430 U.S. 243 (U.S. 1977)
  …supra; Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U. S. 593 (1960); Machine Workers v. Oxco Brush Div., 517 F. 2d 239, 242-243 (CA6 1975); Procter & Gamble Ind. Union v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co., 312 F. 2d 181, 186 (CA2 1962), cert. denied, 374 U. S. 830 (1963). Nolde concedes as much by limiting its claim of nonarbitrability to those disputes which clearly arise after the contract’s expiration. Brief for Petitioner 22. Our holding in John Wiley & Sons is instructive on this matter. There we held t…
• Amstar Corp. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 615 F.2d 252 (5th Cir. 1980)
  …ct court’s finding of likelihood of confusion. The determination as to whether confusion is likely has been held to present a question of law, Fleischman Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co., 314 F. 2d [*258] 149, 152 (9th Cir. 1963), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 830, 83 S.Ct. 1870, 10 L.Ed.2d 1053 (1963); a mixed question of law and fact, B. H. Bunn Co. v. AAA Replacement Parts Co., 451 F. 2d 1254, 1261 (5th Cir. 1971), and a question of fact, T.G.I. Fridays v. International Restaurant Group, Inc., 569 F. 2d 8…