SPARKS

v.

MARYLAND

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• United States v. Ragland, 375 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …tify for or against Ragland. . It can be noted, however, even if not necessary to our decision, that although there are state decisions to the contrary, see, e. g., cases cited in Casias v. United States, 315 F. 2d 614, 620 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 845, 83 S.Ct. 1901, 10 L.Ed.2d 1065 (1963) (Murrah, C. J., dissenting), the federal courts have uniformly answered this question in the negative. A juror is not disqualified merely because he has previously heard a similar case arising out of a separate…
• United States v. Zettie Haynes, 398 F.2d 980 (2d Cir. 1968)
  …upon implied bias. See, e. g., Dennis v. United States, 339 U.S. 162, 167, 70 S.Ct. 519, 94 L.Ed. 734 (1950); United States v. Wood, supra, 299 U.S. at 133-135, 57 S.Ct. 177; Casias v. United States, 315 F. 2d 614, 615, 619 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 845, 83 S.Ct. 1901, 10 L.Ed.2d 1065 (1963) (conviction affirmed by an equally divided in banc court, both factions drawing the actual bias-implied bias distinction); see generally, Note, [*984] 49 Iowa L.Rev. 1324 (1964). The former type of bias is ba…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Willie v. Maggio, 737 F.2d 1372 (5th Cir. 1984)
  …fenses arising from the same transaction and are tried separately, a juror who has convicted in one case is not competent to sit in another. See, e.g., United States v. Haynes, supra; Casias v. United States, 315 F. 2d 614 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 845, 83 S.Ct. 1901, 10 L.Ed.2d 1065 (1963); Everitt v. United States, 281 F. 2d 429 (5th Cir.1960). Here, of course, none of the four jurors who were present for part of the Vaccaro voir dire heard any evidence implicating either Willie or Vaccaro, hear…