PERRY

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By

• LaCLAIR v. United States, 374 F.2d 486 (7th Cir. 1967)
  …ns, however, applied the rule that unless due process requires appointment, the question is for the sound discretion of the district court. The decisions of this court are in accord. McCartney v. United States, 311 F. 2d 475 (7th Cir.) cert, denied, 374 U.S. 848, 83 S.Ct. 1910, 10 L.Ed.2d 1068 (1963); Kapsalis v. United States, 345 F. 2d 392 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 382 U.S. 946, 86 S.Ct. 406, 15 L.Ed.2d 354 (1965); Sweeney v. United States, 353 F. 2d 10 (7th Cir. 1965); Mitchell v. United States, 359 F. 2…
• Barker v. The State OF Ohio, 330 F.2d 594 (6th Cir. 1964)
  …89 L.Ed. 2003; Graeber v. Schneckloth, 241 F. 2d 710, C.A.9th; Stidham v. United States, 170 F. 2d 294, 297, C.A. 8th. See also: Gilpin v. United States, 265 F. 2d 203, 204, C.A.6th; McCartney v. United States, 311 F. 2d 475, C.A.7th, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 848, 83 S.Ct. 1910, 10 L.Ed.2d 1068; Crowe v. United States, 175 F. 2d 799, 801, C.A.4th, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 950, 70 S.Ct. 478, 94 L.Ed. 586, rehearing denied, 339 U.S. 916, 70 S.Ct. 559, 94 L.Ed. 1341; Richardson v. United States, 199 F. 2d 333, 33…
• Mitchell v. United States, 359 F.2d 833 (7th Cir. 1966)
  …' in those cases indicating a possible departure from the established rule that a request for counsel in § 2255 proceedings is “addressed to the sound discretion of the court,” McCartney v. United States, 311 F. 2d 475, 476 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 374 U.S. 848, 83 S.Ct. 1910, 10 L.Ed.2d 1068 (1963), this court did not intend the broad rule contended for by Mitchell. This is shown by Kapsalis v. United States, 345 F. 2d 392, 395 (7th Cir. 1965) —appointment of counsel in these proceedings is a matter for t…