COX

v.

ILLINOIS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Clausell, 474 So. 2d 1189 (Fla. 1985)
  …one, 452 F. 2d 274 (7th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 964, 92 S.Ct. 1169, 31 L.Ed.2d 240 (1972); People ex rel. Younger v. Superior Court, 86 Cal.App.3d 180, 150 Cal.Rptr. 156 (1978); People v. Mann, 27 Ill.2d 135, 188 N.E. 2d 665, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 855, 83 S.Ct. 1923, 10 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1963); State v. Mercer, 625 P. 2d 44 (Mont.1981); State v. Martinez, 89 N.M. 729, 557 P. 2d 578 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 90 N.M. 8, 558 P. 2d 620 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 973, 97 S.Ct. 1663, 52 L.Ed.2d 367 (197…
• Clausell v. State, 455 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …uld not have been allowed to testify because it was prejudicial to the defendants due to the prestige of witness’s office); United States v. Callanan, 450 F. 2d 145 (4th Cir.1971) (same); People v. Mann, 27 I11.2d 135, 188 N.E. 2d 665, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 855, 83 S.Ct. 1923, 10 L.Ed.2d 1075 (1963) (same, implicit); Lukas v. State, 194 Wis. 387, 216 N.W. 483 (1927) (same, implicit).1 Clausell suggests, however, that this otherwise admissible testimony cannot be elicited by any other Assistant State Attorn…