BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN ET AL.

v.

CHICAGO & ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By

• Ashley v. United Transp. Union & ITS Affiliated Local NO. 1121, 625 F.2d 1357 (8th Cir. 1980)
  …tances may be proscribed by the RLA also appear in In re Brotherhood of Railway Clerks, 605 F. 2d 1073, 1075 (8th Cir. 1979), and Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 315 F. 2d 771, 775 (7th Cir.), vacated as moot, 375 U.S. 18, 84 S.Ct. 61, 11 L.Ed.2d 39 (1963). We hesitate to endorse the district court’s reliance on the RLA because the rationale for invoking the RLA to enjoin the picketing involved in this case is not clear.17 The National Labor Relations Act specifies…
• Trans Int'l Airlines, Inc. v. Int'l Bhd. OF Teamsters, 650 F.2d 949 (9th Cir. 1980)
  …t that regardless of any contract provisions, all sym [*967] pathy strikes may be enjoined as violating policies expressed in the RLA. See Chicago & Illinois Midland Ry. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 315 F. 2d 771 (7th Cir.), vacated as moot, 375 U.S. 18, 84 S.Ct. 61, 11 L.Ed.2d 39 (1963). Compare Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R., 362 F. 2d 649 (5th Cir.), aff’d by an equally divided court, 385 U.S. 20, 87 S.Ct. 226, 17 L.Ed.2d 20 (1966); Brotherhood of Locomotive Fireme…
• Brotherhood OF Locomotive Firemen AND Enginemen v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 346 F.2d 673 (5th Cir. 1965)
  …carrier subject to the provisions of this chapter or any common carrier by water subject to chapter 12 of this title.” . See. Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, 8 Cir., 1963, 315 F. 2d 771, vacated as moot, 375 U.S. 18, 84 S.Ct. 61, 11 L.Ed.2d 39 on the question which would he presented should the Port Authority seek an injunction. See particularly the dissenting opinion on the problem of separating the major dispute from the minor dispute, and accommodating this…