SHOCKEY
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1963-10-14
No. 20
Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
375 U.S. 22 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 11 L. Ed. 2d 43 · 84 S. Ct. 83 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 531 · SCDB 1963-007
Cited by 12 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Illinois for further consideration in light of Douglas v. California, 372 U. S. 353.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in Daegele v. Kansas, ante, p. 1, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Williams v. United States, 402 F.2d 548 (8th Cir. 1968)
    …[*552] through appeal, has been recognized by numerous Supreme Court decisions, including Anders v. State of California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493; Swenson v. Bosler, 386 U.S. 258, 87 S.Ct. 996, 18 L.Ed.2d 33; Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U.S. 22, 84 S.Ct. 83, 11 L.Ed.2d 43; Douglas v. People of State of California, 372 U.S. 353, 83 S.Ct. 814, 9 L.Ed.2d 811; Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799. We have no doubt that the period between the date of sentence and the…
    1 / 2
  • Henry v. City of Rock Hill, 376 U.S. 776 (U.S. 1964)
    …m all obstacles to reversal on an intervening precedent, we remand the case to the state court for reconsideration. Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U. S. 1; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2; Newsome v. North Carolina, 375 U. S. 21; Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U. S. 22; Ausbie v. California, 375 U. S. 24; Herrera v. Heinze, 375 U. S. 26; Barnes v. North Carolina, 375 U. S. 28. The South Carolina Supreme Court examined Edwards and the later case of Fields v. South [*777] Carolina, 375 U. S. 44, found them not contr…
  • Blanchard v. Lou V. Brewer, 429 F.2d 89 (8th Cir. 1970)
    …nited States, 237 A. 2d 827, D.C.Ct. App.; People v. Shockey, 25 Ill.2d 528, 185 N.E. 2d 893, 897 (dissenting opinion Justice Shaefer). The holding of the majority in the case last cited was reversed in Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U.S. 22, 84 S.Ct. 83, 11 L. Ed.2d 43. “We hold Williams was deprived of his constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel at the critical time between sentence and the expiration of time to appeal and that he was thereby deprived of his constitutional right to appellate revi…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw