NICHOLSON
v.
BOLES, WARDEN
NICHOLSON
BOLES, WARDEN
375 U.S. 25
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. In light of the confession of error by the Attorney General and upon an examination of the record, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia for further consideration.
Mr. Justice Stewart is of the opinion the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Swarb v. Lennox, 405 U.S. 191 (U.S. 1972)…rror in the appellate court, nor can he be heard if the proceedings in the appeal are correct, except in support of the decree from which the appeal of the other party is taken.’ ” Mayberry v. Pennsylvania, 382 U. S. 286 (1965); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U. S. 25 (1963). See R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court Practice 224-225 (4th ed. 1969). Cf. California Welfare Rights Organization v. Superior Court of Alameda County, 5 Cal. 3d 730, 488 P. 2d 953 (1971), where a state official against whom an adverse j…
-
Lawrence and next friend v. Chater, 516 U.S. 163 (U.S. 1996)…94); Ramirez v. United States, 510 U. S. 1103 (1994); Chappell v. United States, 494 U. S. 1075 (1990); Polsky v. Wetherill, 403 U. S. 916 (1971), and state attorneys general, see, e. g., Cuffle v. Avenenti, 498 U. S. 996 (1990); Nicholson v. Boles, 375 U. S. 25 (1963). This practice has some virtues. In an appropriate case, a GVR order conserves the scarce resources of this Court that might otherwise be expended on plenary consideration, assists the court below by flagging a particular issue that it does…