BARNES
v.
NORTH CAROLINA

U.S. | 1963-10-14
No. 385
Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.
375 U.S. 28 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 11 L. Ed. 2d 45 · 84 S. Ct. 137 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 537 · SCDB 1963-012
Cited by 16 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.

Mr. Justice Harlan, for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, ante, p. 3, would have withheld disposition of this petition for certiorari until the disposition, after argument, of that case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hutcherson v. United States, 345 F.2d 964 (D.C. Cir. 1965)
    …28 Cal.Rptr. 489, 378 P. 2d 793, cert. denied, 374 U.S. 856, 83 S.Ct. 1927, 10 L.Ed.2d 1076 (1963); State of Louisiana, ex rel. Blouin v. Walker, 244 La. 699, 154 So. 2d 368 (1963), cert. denied sub nom. Watkins v. Walker, 375 U.S. 988, 84 S.Ct. 96, 11 L.Ed.2d 45 (1964); Salas v. State of Texas, Tex. Cr.App., 365 S.W. 2d 174, appeal dismissed, 375 U.S. 15, 84 S.Ct. 96, 11 L.Ed.2d 45 (1963). Compare People v. Davis, 27 Ill.2d 57, 188 N.E. 2d 225 (1963); State of Missouri v. Bridges, 360 S.W. 2d 648 (Mo.1962),…
    1 / 2
  • Dreiling v. Gen. Elec. Co., 511 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1975)
    …84 S.Ct. 1351, 12 L.Ed.2d 306; 391 F. 2d 97 (1968), overruled en banc 409 F. 2d 1166 (1969), cert, denied 1970, 397 U.S. 911, 90 S.Ct. 912, 25 L.Ed.2d 93; Lartigue v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 5 Cir. 1963, 317 F. 2d 19, cert. denied 375 U.S. 865, 84 S.Ct. 137, 11 L.Ed.2d 92. As indicated earlier in this Note the second issue submitted to the jury was that of strict liability. The concept followed was that set forth in Restatement of Torts, Second, Sec. 402(A), and particularly Comment g and Comment k th…
  • Henry v. City of Rock Hill, 376 U.S. 776 (U.S. 1964)
    …ation. Daegele v. Kansas, 375 U. S. 1; Pickelsimer v. Wainwright, 375 U. S. 2; Newsome v. North Carolina, 375 U. S. 21; Shockey v. Illinois, 375 U. S. 22; Ausbie v. California, 375 U. S. 24; Herrera v. Heinze, 375 U. S. 26; Barnes v. North Carolina, 375 U. S. 28. The South Carolina Supreme Court examined Edwards and the later case of Fields v. South [*777] Carolina, 375 U. S. 44, found them not controlling, and reaffirmed the convictions. In its opinion on the remand in the present case, the South Carolina…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw