CADE

v.

LOUISIANA

Citator

Cited By

• COX v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 536 (U.S. 1965)
  …of disturbing the peace.” La. Rev. Stat. § 14:103.i (Cum. Supp. 1962). It is clear to us that on the facts of this case, which are strikingly similar to those present in Edwards v. South [*545] Carolina, 372 U. S. 229, and Fields v. South Carolina, 375 U. S. 44, Louisiana infringed appellant’s rights of free speech and free assembly by convicting him under this'statute. As in Edwards, we do not find it necessary to pass upon appellant’s contention that there was a complete absence of evidence so that his c…
• COX v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 559 (U.S. 1965)
  …ll have averted a major catastrophe.” Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229, 243-244 (dissenting opinion of Clark, J.)-. Nor can I agree that the instant case is controlled by either Edwards v. South Carolina, supra, or Fields v. South Carolina, 375 U. S. 44 (1963). Both went off on their peculiar facts and neither dealt with a situation like the one here before the Court. Moreover, Edwards and Fields involved convictions for common-law breach, of the peace and not violation of a statute. In any event,…
• City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808 (U.S. 1966)
  …l Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 244, 42 U. S. C. §2000a-2 (1964 ed.). See infra, at 847-848 and note 12. And see Edwards v. South Carolina, 372 U. S. 229 (1963) (nearly two years from arrest to our reversal of convictions); Fields v. South Carolina, 375 U. S. 44 (1963) (three and a half years from arrest to our reversal of convictions); Henry v. City of Rock Hill, 376 U. S. 776 (1964) (more than four years from arrest to our reversal of convictions). Compare the language of § 203 of the Civil Rights Act of…