JACOBS
v.
ARIZONA

U.S. | 1963-10-21
No. 420
375 U.S. 46 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Iva May Harvey, 661 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1981)
    …ed accretion as a “gradual and imperceptible” movement. An instruction modeled on Arizona law5 would contain the same language.6 See State v. Jacobs, 93 Ariz. 336, 338-40, 380 P. 2d 998, 1000-01, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, Jacobs v. Arizona, 375 U.S. 46, 84 S.Ct. 158, 11 L.Ed.2d 108 (1963); Lusting State v. Bonelli Cattle Co., 107 Ariz. 465, 469, 489 P. 2d 699, 703, supplemented, 108 Ariz. 258, 495 P. 2d 1312 (1972), rev’d, 414 U.S. 313, 94 S.Ct. 517, 38 L.Ed.2d 526 (1973); State v. Gunther & [*772…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw