BANKS
v.
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
BANKS
WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
375 U.S. 51
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 11 L. Ed. 2d 108 · 84 S. Ct. 152 · 1963 U.S. LEXIS 403 · SCDB 1963-015
Cited by 3 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam.
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Florida for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.
Mr. Justice Douglas and Mr. Justice Clark dissent for the reason that the judgment rests on an adequate state ground.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Edwards v. Holman, 342 F.2d 679 (5th Cir. 1965)…ior to his confession. We find no error in the record and the judgment is Affirmed. . Edwards v. State of Alabama, 274 Ala. 561, 150 So. 2d 709; Edwards v. State of Alabama, 274 Ala. 569, 150 So. 2d 710. . Edwards v. Alabama, 1963, 375 U.S. 882, 84 S.Ct. 152, 11 L.Ed.2d 112. . Citing, Townsend v. Sain, 1963, 372 U.S. 293, 314, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770. . See Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P.; Rushing v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir. 1959, 272 F. 2d 633. . “Q. How long after his arrest was he allowed to see anyone? “A.…
-
United States v. Iva May Harvey, 661 F.2d 767 (9th Cir. 1981)…and imperceptible” movement. An instruction modeled on Arizona law5 would contain the same language.6 See State v. Jacobs, 93 Ariz. 336, 338-40, 380 P. 2d 998, 1000-01, cert. denied and appeal dismissed, Jacobs v. Arizona, 375 U.S. 46, 84 S.Ct. 158, 11 L.Ed.2d 108 (1963); Lusting State v. Bonelli Cattle Co., 107 Ariz. 465, 469, 489 P. 2d 699, 703, supplemented, 108 Ariz. 258, 495 P. 2d 1312 (1972), rev’d, 414 U.S. 313, 94 S.Ct. 517, 38 L.Ed.2d 526 (1973); State v. Gunther & [*772] Shirley Co., 5 Ariz.App. 77,…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (U.S. 1963)