COURTESY SANDWICH SHOP, INC., ET AL.
v.
PORT OF NEW YORK AUTHORITY ET AL.

U.S. | 1963-11-12
No. 399
375 U.S. 78 Supreme Court of the United States (1963) Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases

Per_curiam
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …egislation containing the covenant was promptly launched. New Jersey and New York joined in the defense. The attack proved unsuccessful. Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority, 12 N. Y. 2d 379, 190 N. E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed, 375 U. S. 78 (1963). See Kheel v. Port of New York Authority, 331 F. Supp. 118 (SDNY 1971), aff’d, 457 F. 2d 46 (CA2), cert. denied, 409 U. S. 983 (1972). With the legislation embracing the covenant thus effective, the Port Authority on September 1, 1962, assum…
  • …York Court of Appeals had ruled against the plaintiffs, Courtesy Sandwich Shop v. Port of New York Authority, 12 N.Y.2d 379, 240 N.Y.S.2d 1, 190 N.E. 2d 402 (1963), the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal “for want of a substantial federal question.” 375 U.S. 78, 84 S.Ct. 194, 11 L.Ed. 2d 141 (1963). It is true that the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals was principally devoted to the issue of public purpose, on which the Appellate Division had ruled adversely to the Port Authority, Courtesy Sandwich…
  • …Rumely, 345 U.S. 41, 45, 73 S.Ct. 543, 97 L.Ed. 770 (1953); People v. Bell, 306 N.Y. 110, 114, 115 N.E. 2d 821 (1954); Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York Authority, 12 N.Y.2d 379, 389, 240 N.Y.S.2d 1, 190 N.E. 2d 402, appeal dismissed, 375 U.S. 78, 84 S.Ct. 194, 11 L.Ed.2d 141 (1963). For reasons sufficiently indicated in Minichiello v. Rosenberg, supra, 410 F. 2d at 109-110, 119-120 (concurring opinion of Judge Hays), and in this opinion, we are convinced that the constitutional doubt with…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw