HANSELL ET AL.

v.

DOUGLASS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Local 57, Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, AFL-CIO v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 374 F.2d 295 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …r labor practices, they may properly be prevented from retaining the benefits of such conduct. See, e. g., Franks Bros. Go. v. NLRB, 321 U.S. 702, 64 S.Ct. 817, 88 L.Ed. 1020 (1943). . See also NLRB v. International Union, Progressive Mine Workers, 375 U.S. 396, 84 S.Ct. 453, 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1963); NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 748 n. 16, 82 S.Ct. 1107, 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962); NLRB v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U.S. 512, 62 S.Ct. 397, 86 L.Ed. 380 (1942); Sakrete of Northern Cal., Inc. v. NLRB, 332 F. 2d 902, 909 (…
• Bryant Chucking Grinder Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., 389 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1967)
  …177, 61 S.Ct. 845, 85 L.Ed. 1271 (1941). . NLRB v. P. Lorillard Co., 314 U.S. 512, 62 S.Ct. 397, 86 L.Ed. 380 (1942); NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 82 S.Ct. 1107, 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962); NLRB v. International Union, Progressive Mine Workers of America, 375 U.S. 396, 84 S. Ct. 453, 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1964). . These are the cards of Davidson, Davis, Gray, Hall, Sherer, Westcott, Morris and Perry. The Examiner assumed, without deciding, that the latter two cards should not be counted. The testimony is enlightening:…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Warrensburg Bd. & Paper Corp., 340 F.2d 920 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …ullivan or a Charles Dickens further material from which they can ridicule the eccentricities of the law. I find nothing in the summary reversal in National Labor Relations Board v. International Union, Progressive Mine Workers of America, et al., 375 U.S. 396 84 S.Ct. 453, 11 L.Ed.2d 412 (1964), reversing 319 F. 2d 428 (7 Cir., 1963) or in NLRB v. Katz, 369 U.S. 736, 82 S.Ct. 1107, 8 L.Ed.2d 230 (1962) which indicates that the rights of employer and employee specified by the Supreme Court in Brooks v. N…

  ← 1 / 2 →