UNGAR

v.

SARAFITE, JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Ungar v. Sarafite, 376 U.S. 575 (U.S. 1964)
  …, 189 N. E. 2d 629, 190 N. E. 2d 539, and we noted probable jurisdiction to consider whether the procedures seemingly authorized by §§ 750 and 751 of the New York Judiciary Law were consistent with the Due Process-Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 375 U. S. 809. We have decided that the constitutional objections which this record shows to have been seasonably tendered to the New York courts and decided by them are without merit. I. The contempt proceeding grew out of the trial of Huían Jack for conspirac…
• Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324 (U.S. 1964)
  …estic channels, but pointed out that “the Liquor Authority has neither alleged nor proved the diversion of so much as one bottle of plaintiff’s merchandise to users within the state of New York.” 212 F. Supp., at 386. We noted probable jurisdiction, 375 U. S. 809, and for the reasons which follow, we affirm the judgment of the District Court. We hold first that the District Court did not err in declining to defer to the state courts before deciding this controversy on its merits. The doctrine of abstention…
• Mass. Trs. of E. GAS & Fuel Assocs. v. United States, 377 U.S. 235 (U.S. 1964)
  …se of computing such profits. [*369] Because a considerable number of suits are pending in the lower courts which will turn on resolution of these issues, and because of a conflict among the circuits as to the first issue,2 we brought the case here. 375 U. S. 809. For reasons to follow, we affirm the judgment below upholding the power of the Commission to act as it did. I. The Merchant Marine Act, 1936, 49 Stat. 1985, as amended, 46 U. S. C. §§ 1101-1294, provided for the charter of government vessels by t…