RUGENDORF
v.
UNITED STATES
RUGENDORF
UNITED STATES
375 U.S. 812
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 (U.S. 1964)…Criminal Appeals, the conviction was affirmed, 172 Tex. Cr. R. 629, 362 S. W. 2d 111, affirmance upheld on rehearing, 172 Tex. Cr. R. 631, 362 S. W. 2d 112. We granted a writ of certiorari to consider the important constitutional questions involved. 375 U. S. 812. In Ker v. California, 374 U. S. 23, we held that the Fourth “Amendment’s proscriptions are enforced against the States through the Fourteenth Amendment,” and that “the standard of reasonableness is the same under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendmen…
-
Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (U.S. 1970)
-
Rugendorf v. United States, 376 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1964)…ce because they were seized on the authority of a search warrant supported by a deficient affidavit; and that the names of certain confidential informants referred to in the affidavit should have been disclosed. 316 F. 2d 589. We granted certiorari, 375 U. S. 812, and affirm the judgment. I. The search warrant under attack was issued by the United States Commissioner on the strength of an affidavit dated March 22, 1962, and signed by Marlin Moore, a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence