IMPERIAL MEAT CO. ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (19 total)

• United States v. Stanford, 589 F.2d 285 (7th Cir. 1978)
  …as “primary and dominant” and test the sufficiency of the instrument on the basis of that part. The validity of an indictment is tested by examining the instrument as a whole. Imperial Meat v. United States, 316 F. 2d 435 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820, 84 S.Ct. 57, 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963). [*296] The fraudulent nature of a scheme should not be measured by a technical standard. Blachly v. United States, 380 F. 2d 665, 671 (5th Cir. 1967). “The law does not define fraud; it needs no definition; it is…
• United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …7, 94 S.Ct. 1937, 40 L.Ed.2d 287 (1974). See also United States v. Ruehrup, 333 F. 2d 641, 643 (7 Cir.), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 903, 85 S.Ct. 194, 13 L.Ed.2d 177 (1964); Imperial Meat Co. v. United States, 316 F. 2d 435, 440 (10 Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820, 84 S.Ct. 57, 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963). Appellant seeks to come within the Travis holding by arguing that just as in Travis where the filing of the non-Communist affidavit was simply a prerequisite to future conduct, resort to NLRB processes, so the fi…
• Brotherhood OF Railroad Trainmen v. The Akron & Barberton Belt R.R. Co., 385 F.2d 581 (D.C. Cir. 1967)
  …k rules incompatible with those imposed by the Award or with the report of the Presidential Emergency Board reflective of bad faith on the part of the unions. Compare Pullman Co. v. Order of Railway Conductors, 316 E.2d 556 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 820, 84 S.Ct. 57, 11 L.Ed.2d 54 (1963). . The District Opinion is reported: Akron & B. Belt R.R. v. Order of Railway Conductors, 253 F.Supp. 538 (D.D.C.1966). . The carriers lodged a further objection on the ground that the OROB is not the certified b…