ANTHONY ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS GRAYDON ANTHONY LUMBER CO.,

v.

LOUISIANA & ARKANSAS RAILWAY CO.

Citator

Cited By (29 total)

• Carpenters Local Union NO. 1846 OF the United Bhd. OF Carpenters & Joiners OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc., 690 F.2d 489 (5th Cir. 1982)
  …e strike; “supplying temporary replacement workers did not have any anticompetitive effect beyond the labor relations at the [local grocery] store.” 597 F. 2d at 136 & n.7. In Kennedy v. Long Island R. R. Co., 319 F. 2d 366 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 830, 84 [*533] S.Ct. 75, 11 L.Ed.2d 61 (1963), it was alleged that an agreement within the railroad industry for a strike insurance plan violated the Sherman Act. The court in Kennedy held that, the plan did not “effect[] an unnatural and anti-competiti…
• The Del. & Hudson Ry. Co. v. United Transp. Union, 450 F.2d 603 (D.C. Cir. 1971)
  …lective strikes as a legitimate and legal union weapon upon exhaustion of statutory procedural requirements., Kennedy et al. v. Long Island Rail Road Company, et al., 211 F. Supp. 478 (S.D.N.Y.1962), aff’d 319 F. 2d 366 (2nd Cir. 1963), cert, denied 375 U.S. 830, 84 S.Ct. 75, 11 L.Ed.2d 61 (1963). There, as a direct response to [*638] the union’s strike against a single railroad, the Long Island, the carriers created an insurance plan designed to protect their group. No contention was made by the carriers t…
• E. AIR Lines, Inc. v. McDONNELL Douglas Corp., 532 F.2d 957 (5th Cir. 1976)
  …atory provision to the specifically listed events despite words expressly stating that the general provision included but was not restricted to those events. Austin Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 1963, 314 F. 2d 518, 520, 161 Ct.Cl. 76, cert. denied, 375 U.S. 830, 84 S.Ct. 75, 11 L.Ed.2d 62. In our view, this decision merits the criticism it has received from Professor Corbin: The court interpreted the . . . “exculpatory clause” as not including the inherent “impossibility” as alleged by the plaintiff, since…