ROMANO

v.

LAVALLEE, WARDEN

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Martino, 664 F.2d 860 (2d Cir. 1981)
  …hat the type of fence opened the yard to public view in this case would — even under the old analysis— have cut the other way. See Polk v. United States, 291 F. 2d 230, 232 (9th Cir. 1961), aff’d after remand, 314 F. 2d 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 844, 84 S.Ct. 96, 11 L.Ed.2d 72 (1963). Since Katz v. United States and its reinforcement by, and perhaps expansion in, Rakas v. Illinois, 439 U.S. 128, 143, 99 S.Ct. 421, 430, 58 L.Ed.2d 387 (1978), both standing and the substantive scope of the Fourt…
• Wagner Elec. Corp. v. Volpe, 466 F.2d 1013 (3d Cir. 1972)
  …d 108 by the elimination of permissible failure rates was sufficient to give interested parties an opportunity to comment on the entire subject matter of the standard. Pointing to cases such as California Citizens Brand Association v. United States, 375 U.S. 844, 88 S.Ct. 96, 19 L.Ed.2d 112 (1967) the Administrator urges that there was adequate compliance with 5 U.S.C. § 553(b) because the notice provides a description of the subjects and issues involved. It buttresses this argument by pointing in the recor…
• United States v. Hipolito Cruz Pagan, 537 F.2d 554 (1st Cir. 1976)
  …e. g., United States v. Freeman, 426 F. 2d 1351 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Llanes, 398 F. 2d 880 (2d Cir. 1968), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 1032, 89 S.Ct. 647, 21 L.Ed.2d 576 (1969); Polk v. United States, 314 F. 2d 837 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 844, 84 S.Ct. 96, 11 L.Ed.2d 72 (1963); United States v. St. Clair, 240 F.Supp. 338 (S.D.N.Y.1965); State v. Crider, 341 A. 2d 1 (Me. 1975); Commonwealth v. Dinnall, Mass., 314 N.E. 2d 903 (1974); Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 488 P. 2d 1161 (1971). But…