KENNEDY

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Rizzo, 418 F.2d 71 (7th Cir. 1969)
  …or further an unlawful activity in violation of state law, and the performance of some act designed to promote or further that illegal purpose. United States v. Bergland, 7 Cir., 318 F. 2d 159, 161, cert. denied, sub nom. Cantrell v. United States, 375 U.S. 861, 84 S.Ct. 129, 11 L.Ed.2d 88; McIntosh v. United States, 8 Cir., 385 F. 2d 274, 276, 277-278; Collins v. United States, 10 Cir., 383 F. 2d 296, 300; cf. United States v. Nardello, supra. Reference to state law is necessary only to identify the type…
• United States v. Wechsler, 392 F.2d 344 (4th Cir. 1968)
  …§ 1952, travel, with a requisite intent plus a subsequent act in furtherance of that intent, would be all that is required to make out a violation. United States v. Bergland, 318 F. 2d 159 (7 Cir. 1963) cert. den., Cantrell, et al v. United States, 375 U.S. 861, 84 S.Ct. 129, 11 L.Ed.2d 88 (1963). The state crimes serve only as a background identification of the unlawful activities in aid of which the proscribed travel loas undertaken. United States v. Kubacki, 237 F.Supp. 639 (E.D.Pa., 1965). The words ‘w…
• McINTOSH v. United States, 385 F.2d 274 (8th Cir. 1967)
  …pports the government’s position that accomplishment of the State substantive offense is not a prerequisite to a Section 1952 conviction. Cf. United States v. Bergland, 318 F. 2d 159 (7th Cir. 1963), cert. denied sub nom., Cantrell v. United States, 375 U.S. 861, 84 S.Ct. 129, 11 L.Ed.2d 88 (1963), wherein the Court stated in sustaining an indictment under Section 1952: “The indictment does not charge the defendants with ‘gambling.’ Rather, the defendants are charged with interstate travel with the intent…