GLANCY

v.

CALIFORNIA

Citator

Cited By

• Arwine v. Bannan, 346 F.2d 458 (6th Cir. 1965)
  …protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, but because of their mobility, rules governing search thereof are substantially different from those governing search of a home. State v. Harris, 265 Minn. 260, 121 N.W. 2d 327, certiorari denied 375 U.S. 867, 84 S.Ct. 141, 11 L.Ed.2d 94. “As a necessary and proper evolution of the living law to meet the changing needs of society, the modern trend of authority is to narrow the concept of immunity against searches and seizures when it involves a motor ve…
• Paul v. Harris, 353 F.2d 119 (8th Cir. 1965)
  …received a recidivist sentence for a mandatory term by reason [*121] of two prior felony convictions.1 The Minnesota Supreme Court affirmed in State v. Harris, supra, and the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari, Harris v. Minnesota, 375 U.S. 867, 84 S.Ct. 141, 11 L.Ed.2d 94 (1963). Appellant’s initial habeas corpus application in the Federal District Court was denied for failure to exhaust available state remedies. Thereafter appellant’s habeas writ was filed in the Minnesota Supreme Court…

  ← 1 / 2 →