ARNOLD ET AL.

v.

NORTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Donovan v. City OF Dallas, 377 U.S. 408 (U.S. 1964)
  …the State Supreme Court’s judgment directing the Civil Court of Appeals to enjoin petitioners from prosecuting their action in the federal courts and also granted certiorari to review the Civil Court of Appeals’ judgment of conviction for contempt. 375 U. S. 878. We think the Texas Court of Civil Appeals was right in its first holding that it was without power to enjoin these litigants from prosecuting their federal-court action, and we therefore reverse the State Supreme Court’s judgment upsetting that of…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Woodward Iron Co. v. United States, 396 F.2d 552 (5th Cir. 1968)
  …ioning his consent on the taxpayer’s acceptance of adjustments that would eliminate any distortion. See Treas.Regs. §§ 1.446-l(c) (2) (ii), (e) (2), and (e) (3). See also Wright Contracting Co. v. C.I.R., 5 Cir. 1963, 316 F. 2d 249, 254, cert. den., 375 U.S. 878, 84 S.Ct. 147, 11 L.Ed.2d 110; Hackensack Water Co. v. United States, 1965, 352 F. 2d 807, 809-811, 173 Ct.Cl. 606 (and cases cited therein). Cf. United States v. Catto, 1966, 384 U.S. 102, 114-116, 86 S.Ct. 1311, 16 L.Ed.2d 398, 406-408. The distr…