RIVERA
v.
HERITAGE, WARDEN
RIVERA
HERITAGE, WARDEN
375 U.S. 883
Supreme Court of the United States (1963)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (15 total)
-
Wade v. United States, 426 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1970)…12, 86 S.Ct. 1932, 16 L.Ed.2d 1030 (1966) ; See also Williams v. State, 451 P. 2d 848, 851 (Nev. 1969) ; Oregon: State v. Gilmore, 242 Or. 463, 410 P. 2d 240 (1966) ; Washington: State v. White, 60 Wash.2d 551, 374 P. 2d 942 (1962) ; cert. denied, 375 U.S. 883, 84 S.Ct. 154, 11 L.Ed.2d 113 (1963) ; City of Seattle v. Hill, 72 Wash.2d 786, 435 P. 2d 692 (1967), cert. denied, 393 U.S. 872, 89 S.Ct. 163, 21 L.Ed.2d 142 (1968). . In Commonwealth v. Rightnour, 435 Pa. 104 at 253 A. 2d 644 at 650 (1969), the S…
-
United States v. Schwartz, 464 F.2d 499 (2d Cir. 1972)…311 F. 2d 128, 132 (1962), (cert. denied, 373 U.S. 946, 83 S.Ct. 1541, 10 L.Ed.2d 701 (1963)).” United States v. Tane, 329 F. 2d 848, 853-854 (2d Cir. 1964). See also, United States v. Ramsey, 315 F. 2d 199 (2d Cir. 1963) (per curiam), cert. denied 375 U.S. 883, 84 S.Ct. 153, 11 L.Ed.2d 113 (1963). We conclude that there was “some competent evidence” to support this indictment and that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to dismiss it.18 Appellant does not claim that the Grand Jury wa…
-
Smith v. The State OF Tex., 395 F.2d 958 (5th Cir. 1968)…fore this Court for the third time. The appellant here has suffered adverse decisions on his claims that his confession was involuntary as a matter of law (Smith v. Heard, S.D.Tex., 214 F.Supp. 909 (1962), affirmed, 5 Cir., 315 F. 2d 692, cert. den. 375 U.S. 883, 84 S.Ct. 154, 11 L.Ed.2d 113), and that the prosecution failed to offer evidence meeting the requirements of Thompson v. City of [*959] Louisville, 362 U.S. 199, 80 S.Ct. 624, 4 L.Ed.2d 654, and Garner v. State of Louisiana, 368 U.S. 157, 82 S.Ct.…
Previewing 3 of 15 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence