BROYDE

v.

PERRY, JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1964)
  …irmed the conviction, 244 La. 787, 154 So. 2d 400. The trial court and the State Supreme Court both rejected appellant’s contention that the statute unconstitutionally abridged his freedom of expression. We noted probable jurisdiction of the appeal. 375 U. S. 900. Argument was first heard in the 1963 Term, and the case was ordered restored to the calendar for reargument, 377 U. S. 986. We reverse. I. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U. S. 254, we held that the Constitution limits state power, in a ci…
• Bridge C.A.T. Scan Assocs. v. Technicare Corp. & Johnson & Johnson, Inc., 710 F.2d 940 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …sclosure to exclude the documents, and we indicated that in the absence of such a modification, a mandamus petition would be viewed favorably. In Parker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 320 F. 2d 937 (2d Cir.), petition for writ of mandamus denied, 375 U.S. 900, 84 S.Ct. 13, 11 L.Ed.2d 157 (1963), we similarly recognized the district court’s inherent power to enjoin the plaintiff from disclosing to others a memorandum she had filed with the court. Id. at 938. But we ruled that the court could not, consiste…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Caparros, 800 F.2d 23 (2d Cir. 1986)
  …s a prior restraint and prior restraints have always been subject to immediate review by appellate courts, see Parker v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., 320 F. 2d 937, 939 (2d Cir.), motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied, 375 U.S. 900, 84 S.Ct. 213, 11 L.Ed.2d 157 (1963); review at this stage is appropriate, it is urged, because denial of a First Amendment right to release and disclose documents cannot be later remedied, see In re Application of the Herald Co., 734 F. 2d 93, 96 (…