PAN AMERICAN FIRE & CASUALTY CO.

v.

PENDLETON

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• United States v. Hearod, 499 F.2d 1003 (5th Cir. 1974)
  …ion of the details of a singular course of conduct in multiple counts will prejudice the defendant and confuse the jury by suggesting that not one but several crimes have been committed. United States v. Ketchum, 320 F. 2d 3 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 905, 84 S.Ct. 194, 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963). The two counts in which Hearod was charged contained simple and direct averments that his assault upon Smith on the night in question violated two separate statutes. There was no threat of generating an adverse…
• United States v. DeALESANDRO, 361 F.2d 694 (2d Cir. 1966)
  …t contends that the joinder of the two counts may- have had an adverse psychological effect on the jury, “by suggesting to it that defendant has committed not one but several crimes.” United States v. Ketchum, 320 F. 2d 3, 8 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 905, 84 S.Ct. 194, 11 L.Ed.2d 145 (1963). The fatal defect in the argument is that Congress has explicitly made defendant’s conduct criminal in two separate statutes, and has indicated that the two are not to be regarded as defining the same offense. 1…
• The Exch. Nat'l Bank OF Olean v. Ins. Co. OF N. Am., 341 F.2d 673 (2d Cir. 1965)
  …New York state court would possess, and hold that these invoices cannot be considered “counterfeit” within the meaning of Insuring Clause (E). See generally, North Carolina Nat’l Bank v. United States Cas. Co., 317 F. 2d 304 (4 Cir.), cert. denied, 375 U.S. 905, 84 S.Ct. 193, 11 L.Ed.2d 144 (1963); First Nat’l Bank of South Carolina of Columbia v. Glens Falls Ins. Co., 304 F. 2d 866 (4 Cir. 1962); First Nat’l Bank of Memphis v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 309 F. 2d 702 (6 Cir. 1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 953,…